Category Archives: Daily life in Anglo-Saxon England

Farmsteads, villages and Towns

Leofwin waving
Leofwin waving

Leofwin is a typical ‘ceorl’, or freeman, living in the village of Prittewella, in the south east of England, by the Thames estuary.

Leofwin’s House
No Anglo-Saxon houses survive! But traces like postholes in the ground show their size and shape. They were squared off, and typically about 30ft x 15ft (10m x 5m). There’s evidence for wooden floors, with a cavity underneath, possibly for storage.

Walls were built either with upright planks slotted together, or by ‘wattle and daub’.  Some homes may have had windows, but there was no glass.  There was a central hearth for warmth and cooking, but chimneys did not appear until medieval times. The smoke simply seeped out through the thatch.

There may have been an ‘upstairs’ in Leofwin’s house, possibly a floor at each end reached by a ladder. Beds were wooden-framed. they probably consisted of a cloth bag stuffed with wool, perhaps, with blankets or fleeces on top. There may have been very little furniture: perhaps a trestle-table, a pair of benches, a chest, baskets, and some shelves. The thatched roof would be smoky and soot-blackened on the inside, ideal for curing meat. 

Drawing of an Anglo-Saxon house.
Drawing of an Anglo-Saxon house.

Outside, there might be a number of smaller buildings associated with the houses: a midden or loo, sheds for tools, storage food and livestock. Evidence survives for many buildings with sunken earth floors: debate continues about their use. Some of the animals may have been brought indoors during the winter. Water had to be brought daily in buckets from the nearest stream or well. After dark, candles or the fire gave the family’s only light.

Leofwin’s village
Archaeology shows houses grouped together into villages, typically of up to ten families – ‘a tithing’. In later times, a village might boast a little wooden church.

Farmsteads
The tradition of free-standing farms dates from from pre-Roman times, through the Roman occupation, into Saxon and Medieval times, to the present day. There were probably a handful of scattered farmsteads within a hour’s walk of Prittewella.

Roman towns

Towns depend on trade and money, law and order to survive.  After the Romans left Britain, no more money was minted, so their great towns and cities fell into ruin. The nearest to Leofwin were Caesaromagus, which the English called Celmeresforda, and Camulodunum, which they re-named Colneceastre. Even Londinium, known to the English as Lundenwic, lay mostly abandoned for a time.*

Saxon towns

From the 700’s onwards, English kings began minting money. With improved trade and a more sophisticated society, towns became possible again. In the late 800’s, King Alfred ordered the building of many new towns as military and economic power-bases, spurred on by the need for defence against the Vikings. By today’s standards, Anglo-Saxon towns and villages were tiny,** but nearly all of them have survived, with something like their Anglo-Saxon names, into the 21st century.

* Chelmsford, Colchester and London.
**The population of England was about one thirtieth of today’s!

Anglo-Saxon Families

Family group
Anglo-Saxon family group

The father was the head of the family in Anglo-Saxon England, and the spear propped up by the door symbolised his role as protector. In fact, the father’s side of the family was called the ‘sperehealf’, while the mother’s side was called the ‘spinelhealf’. The spindle summed up her role in the family, and possessions found in men’s and women’s graves confirm this.

It may have been that the father was expected to be quite strict, and even a little distant from his children.  The mother’s brother (‘eam’) may have been a more caring and friendly male relative, though he only visited from time to time. 

Old English has many more words for different family relatives than modern English, which shows how important the idea of ‘family’ was for them. If you weren’t very good at remembering all the complexities, though, you could call any relative ‘brōðor’ or ‘sweostor’.

You might have ‘stēop-‘ relatives, if your own parents were dead, or ‘fōster-‘ parents, if your real parents had given you away for some reason.

There were almost certainly four or five people in the average family – records from the year 1200 suggest 4.68*. Other relatives, then as now, of course, may have ‘lived in’.

People outside the family, but whose name, family and origin were known would count as ‘cýðð’.    Everybody in the village and the surrounding area would count in this group. Together, your family and friends were ‘cýðð and cynn’, or ‘kith and kin’ in Modern English.

People you didn’t know could become ‘cýðð’ or a  ‘frēond’ or guest after they’d explained exactly who they were. Otherwise, strangers were seen as little different from enemies or slaves – ‘ðēow’.

*quoted in ‘Domesday Quest’, Michael Wood, BBC books, 1986
Thanks also to AC Haynes, ‘Anglo-Saxon Kinship’, in ‘Wiðowinde’, Winter 1998